Kurt Reuss: Ozzie, to me the key issue in the Path America offering is the 'related party' aspect...
DateOctober 31, 2015
I imagine that as EB5 regional centers and issuers rush to file project exemplars, we're probably...
SEC Rule 10b-5: How the SEC defines Fraud
John Tishler: SEC Rule 10b-5 is what I’d call the primary rule of liability we’re concerned about in EB5 offerings or EB5 projects. It applies to any offering of securities that has any jurisdictional nexus to the United States. Jurisdictional nexus simply means that some mode of interstate commerce was used: the telephone, an email, postal delivery. I think it is impossible to imagine an EB5 transaction taking place that did not somehow avail itself of the means of interstate commerce in the United States. 10b-5 is going to apply.
And what it says is that it’s unlawful for any person in connection with the offer or sale of securities to omit or misstate a material fact or to state a fact that, in the context in which it is stated, is misleading. And that’s considered to be a fraud. When people talk about securities fraud, Rule 10b-5 is what they’re referring to.
Comparing the commonly used word “fraud” and the common sense understanding of it, the standard for securities fraud is quite a bit lower than the common sense understanding of that term 'fraud'.
Fraud includes an intent to omit a fact or to state a fact that wasn’t complete in its context. Rule 10b-5 has what’s called a scienter requirement in relation to the omission of facts meaning there has to have been intent.
SEC Rule 10b-5 as a part of EB 5 Process
The intent doesn’t have to be to rip an investor off or to steal from them. You just have to have the intent to omit a material fact or to mislead. In many cases, the decision to omit something might not seem like a big deal. It’s only in hindsight, sometimes many years after the fact, when people are evaluating what actually went wrong that the determination is made.
If an investor either didn’t receive his or her EB5 visa or didn’t get their money returned to them, then it would seem that that omission was significant. At that future point in time, Rule 10b-5 can be triggered even though no one could have imagined that what they were doing, saying or not saying was akin to committing fraud. They just didn’t think they needed to say something or maybe it didn’t even occur to them to say it, but that’s all it takes to trigger this liability under Rule 10b-5.
So what happens when you’re liable under Rule 10b-5? The remedies are damages—generally any damages that the investor can prove, and also a right of rescission, which is the right to get your money back. The 10b-5 remedy is available against anybody who was responsible for the misstatement or the omission.
The individuals who are making the disclosure decisions, the general partner of the Issuer in EB-5, can be personally liable. This is why securities lawyers get so wrapped up in all of this. If we miss something or if we say something that is misleading, potentially it can not only come back on the New Commercial Enterprise (NCE) but also on the individuals who were responsible for the disclosure document.
Kurt (host): I also want to mention that issuers going to market with a 'Regulation S' offering does not provide any exclusion from fraudulent activity.